<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Bird was designed for $6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chidimar.com/twitter-bird-was-designed-for-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chidimar.com/twitter-bird-was-designed-for-6/</link>
	<description>Customize your own Wordpress Blog !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon &#124; Teenius</title>
		<link>http://www.chidimar.com/twitter-bird-was-designed-for-6/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon &#124; Teenius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chidimar.com/?p=233#comment-335</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not really unfair at all. I think the only circumstance in which it would be unfair is if Twitter actually stole his work, which (if I&#039;m correct), they didn&#039;t.

The designer would have been happy designing the bird for that price, and logos are designed for this everyday. It&#039;s only because of Twitter&#039;s huge success that people think this is too low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not really unfair at all. I think the only circumstance in which it would be unfair is if Twitter actually stole his work, which (if I&#8217;m correct), they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The designer would have been happy designing the bird for that price, and logos are designed for this everyday. It&#8217;s only because of Twitter&#8217;s huge success that people think this is too low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
